PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNAX vs. DLDRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGNAX having a 25.96% return and DLDRX slightly lower at 25.52%. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has underperformed DLDRX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while DLDRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


PGNAX

1D
2.05%
1M
2.95%
YTD
25.96%
6M
29.00%
1Y
61.83%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
16.59%
10Y*
11.70%

DLDRX

1D
1.00%
1M
1.07%
YTD
25.52%
6M
30.23%
1Y
53.26%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
25.96%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
25.52%15.04%0.81%1.58%34.18%38.30%6.58%16.64%-17.57%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and DLDRX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.94

The correlation between PGNAX and DLDRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. DLDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DLDRX
DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGNAXDLDRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

3.05

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

3.89

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

7.18

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.39

22.68

-1.29

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the DLDRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and DLDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGNAXDLDRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

3.05

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.55

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than DLDRX's maximum drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and DLDRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNAXDLDRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-69.13%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-7.49%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-32.44%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-32.44%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-54.24%

-9.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.19%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-20.77%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.37%

+0.57%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) at 4.36%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNAXDLDRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.36%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.82%

13.42%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.75%

18.11%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.26%

25.64%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

25.49%

+0.93%

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DLDRX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGNAX vs. DLDRX - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than DLDRX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
1.86%2.33%7.45%12.42%9.66%5.07%1.11%2.16%1.87%0.63%1.44%1.25%
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.76%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNAX and DLDRX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNAX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to DLDRX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs DLDRX's -69.13%.

DLDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNAX and DLDRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer