PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHY vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 0.09% return.


PGHY

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.62%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
4.32%

QGRO

1D
0.54%
1M
1.74%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.15%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHY vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
2.18%8.88%8.39%10.15%-5.50%1.22%3.04%5.87%-1.04%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.09%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%37.99%35.09%-16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHY and QGRO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.34

PGHY vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGHY
QGRO

Financial Services

7.9%
5.9%

Communication Services

6.6%
11.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
12.0%

Energy

3.6%
1.8%

Industrials

3.5%
13.6%

Healthcare

2.5%
12.7%

Utilities

1.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.8%

Technology

1.2%
37.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

PGHY
7.9%
QGRO
5.9%

Communication Services

PGHY
6.6%
QGRO
11.0%

Basic Materials

PGHY
5.8%
QGRO
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PGHY
5.7%
QGRO
12.0%

Energy

PGHY
3.6%
QGRO
1.8%

Industrials

PGHY
3.5%
QGRO
13.6%

Healthcare

PGHY
2.5%
QGRO
12.7%

Utilities

PGHY
1.7%
QGRO
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

PGHY
1.4%
QGRO
3.8%

Technology

PGHY
1.2%
QGRO
37.1%

Real Estate

PGHY
0.5%
QGRO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHY vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGHYQGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.53

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

1.78

+7.78

PGHY vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the QGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHY and QGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGHYQGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.46

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.56

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.65

-0.05

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and QGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHYQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-32.56%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-13.54%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-23.82%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

-31.86%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.71%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-7.67%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

4.04%

-3.25%

Volatility

PGHY vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) is 2.00%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that PGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHYQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

4.33%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.73%

12.03%

-8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06%

15.58%

-10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

21.09%

-15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.04%

22.93%

-15.89%

PGHY vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHY vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than QGRO's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.11%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.20%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHY and QGRO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs QGRO's -32.56%.

On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 11.72% vs 4.49% for PGHY. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.

PGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.29% for QGRO.

PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and QGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer