PGF vs. SPMO
PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGF returned 2.29%/yr vs 20.99%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
PGF vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 2.29%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.99% annualized return.
PGF
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
SPMO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 29.45%
- 6M
- 27.18%
- 1Y
- 41.07%
- 3Y*
- 42.30%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 20.99%
PGF vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.50% | 3.40% | 6.01% | 7.73% | -19.22% | 2.65% | 7.23% | 14.55% | -2.82% | 10.82% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.45% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGF and SPMO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGF vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
PGF
SPMO
PGF vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.37 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 3.25 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 12.18 | -11.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGF vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -30.95% | -44.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -12.70% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -20.13% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -22.74% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.92% | -30.95% | +2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -4.87% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -4.59% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 3.38% | -1.02% |
Volatility
PGF vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.49%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 11.77% | -10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.10% | 17.74% | -13.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29% | 20.51% | -14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 19.87% | -8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.01% | 20.60% | -8.59% |
PGF vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGF vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.36% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGF and SPMO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to PGF (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.99% vs 2.29% for PGF. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.99% return vs 2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.36%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
PGF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGF and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer