PGF vs. PQDI
PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) and PQDI (Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PGF tracks the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index while PQDI tracks the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGF returned -0.81%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for PQDI. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PQDI.
Performance
PGF vs. PQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PQDI's 1.19% return.
PGF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
PQDI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PGF vs. PQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.31% | 3.40% | 6.01% | 7.73% | -19.22% | 2.65% | 9.04% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 1.19% | 8.46% | 9.99% | 6.24% | -9.61% | 3.10% | 9.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGF and PQDI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PGF and PQDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PGF vs. PQDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGF
PQDI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PGF
PQDI
Basic Materials
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Communication Services
PGF
-
PQDI
Consumer Cyclical
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Consumer Defensive
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Energy
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Healthcare
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Industrials
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Real Estate
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Technology
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Utilities
PGF
-
PQDI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGF vs. PQDI — Risk / Return Rank
PGF
PQDI
PGF vs. PQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGF | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 2.22 | -1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 3.24 | -2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.48 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 2.16 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 9.67 | -7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGF | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.22 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.69 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.03 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
PGF vs. PQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than PQDI's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and PQDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGF | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -17.41% | -58.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -3.31% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -3.31% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -17.41% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -0.63% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -3.51% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 0.74% | +1.46% |
Volatility
PGF vs. PQDI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) at 1.07%. This indicates that PGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGF | PQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.07% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | 2.81% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.28% | 3.22% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 4.69% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 4.55% | +7.45% |
PGF vs. PQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PQDI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGF vs. PQDI - Dividend Comparison
PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than PQDI's 5.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.33% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF | 5.46% | 5.02% | 4.93% | 5.35% | 5.60% | 5.21% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGF and PQDI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGF has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to PQDI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs PQDI's -17.41%.
On 5-year performance, PQDI leads with 3.23% vs -0.81% for PGF. On fees, PQDI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PQDI has performed better with a 3.23% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PQDI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 5.46% for PQDI.
PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while PQDI tracks ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.60% for PQDI.
PQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGF and PQDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer