PGF vs. DBE
PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PGF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGF returned 2.30%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for DBE. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
PGF vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 2.30%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.
PGF
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
DBE
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- 79.04%
- 6M
- 69.31%
- 1Y
- 81.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
PGF vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.24% | 3.40% | 6.01% | 7.73% | -19.22% | 2.65% | 7.23% | 14.55% | -2.82% | 10.82% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 79.04% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 19.72% | -12.95% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGF and DBE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.15 |
The correlation between PGF and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGF vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
PGF
DBE
PGF vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.39 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 5.67 | -4.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 11.08 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.33 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.65 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.41 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.09 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PGF vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -86.69% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -14.41% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -23.89% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -38.74% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.92% | -60.84% | +31.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -32.03% | +26.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -57.30% | +50.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 7.37% | -5.16% |
Volatility
PGF vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.47%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGF | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 13.05% | -11.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | 30.97% | -26.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.27% | 35.07% | -28.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 29.41% | -18.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 28.34% | -16.34% |
PGF vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGF vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.16% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.32% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGF and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to PGF (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.58% vs 2.30% for PGF. On fees, PGF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PGF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.
PGF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGF and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer