PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGBOX vs. BIMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (PGBOX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGBOX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PGBOX has underperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.89% annualized return.


PGBOX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.72%
6M
-0.04%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.51%

BIMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGBOX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
0.15%7.10%1.81%5.42%-12.56%-1.36%7.85%8.06%-0.06%3.55%
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
0.29%6.76%3.21%5.53%-8.88%-1.68%7.16%6.83%0.30%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PGBOX and BIMSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000

0.91

The correlation between PGBOX and BIMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGBOX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGBOX
PGBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PGBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PGBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMSX
BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (PGBOX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGBOXBIMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.69

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

4.78

-2.19

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGBOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the BIMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGBOX and BIMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGBOX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGBOX and BIMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGBOXBIMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-13.07%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-1.87%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-2.57%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

-13.00%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.88%

-13.07%

-3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.88%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-1.59%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.66%

+0.59%

Volatility

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (PGBOX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 0.80%. This indicates that PGBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGBOXBIMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.80%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

1.88%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

2.49%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

3.88%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

3.25%

+1.45%

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGBOX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGBOX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison

PGBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than BIMSX's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.59%3.50%3.44%2.81%1.81%1.90%3.08%2.16%2.14%1.98%1.89%2.21%
PGBOX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
3.52%3.71%3.69%3.26%2.41%2.56%3.75%2.97%2.65%2.63%2.66%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGBOX and BIMSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGBOX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to BIMSX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGBOX dropped -18.42% vs BIMSX's -13.07%.

BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGBOX and BIMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer