PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 8.96%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.


PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%

QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.93%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
35.82%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and QQQ is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.30

The correlation between PG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.37

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

3.01

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

11.22

-11.90

PG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

-82.97%

+28.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-11.96%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-22.77%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-35.12%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-35.12%

+11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.29%

-3.33%

-9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-32.75%

+20.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

3.20%

+5.60%

Volatility

PG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

7.56%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

13.81%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

17.19%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

22.55%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

22.38%

-3.33%

Dividends

PG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PG and QQQ have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer