PG vs. AJG
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.64%/yr vs 17.92%/yr for AJG. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. AJG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than AJG's -17.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed AJG with an annualized return of 8.64%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.92% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
AJG
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- -17.35%
- 6M
- -10.08%
- 1Y
- -34.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.92%
PG vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -17.35% | -8.03% | 27.34% | 20.51% | 12.44% | 39.02% | 32.12% | 31.79% | 19.19% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and AJG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1984 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PG and AJG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$5.23
AJG:
$5.74
PG:
27.76
AJG:
37.04
PG:
6.79
AJG:
3.84
PG:
4.07
AJG:
3.97
PG:
$86.72B
AJG:
$13.94B
PG:
$43.64B
AJG:
$7.63B
PG:
$22.63B
AJG:
$3.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank
PG
AJG
PG vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.78 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.85 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.47 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -1.25 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum AJG drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and AJG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -57.49% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -40.64% | +25.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -44.40% | +23.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -44.40% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -44.40% | +20.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -38.26% | +22.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -12.83% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 24.06% | -15.13% |
Volatility
PG vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 7.01%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 8.97% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 22.42% | -7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 27.95% | -9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 22.96% | -5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 23.08% | -4.03% |
Dividends
PG vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than AJG's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.27% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
PG vs. AJG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and AJG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs AJG's -57.49%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and AJG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer