PFUT vs. FTGC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.

Performance

PFUT vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTGC

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 3.06%
• 6M: 20.93%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 1Y: 34.47%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: 7.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.60%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	25.30%	14.61%	9.96%	-5.36%	17.36%	8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and FTGC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.14

The correlation between PFUT and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	FTGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.92	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.29	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	FTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.47%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.04%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-27.25%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	FTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.79%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.87%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.72%	—

PFUT vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	15.46%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and FTGC in my portfolio?

PFUT and FTGC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or FTGC?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or FTGC?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or FTGC?

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.46%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and FTGC?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.95% for FTGC.