PFUT vs. COMT
PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. PFUT is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
PFUT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFUT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 25.16%
- YTD
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
PFUT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 13.60% | 29.98% | -33.60% | 0.60% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 29.18% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFUT and COMT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between PFUT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFUT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
PFUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COMT
PFUT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFUT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFUT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFUT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -51.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -11.96% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.97% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.10% | — |
Volatility
PFUT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFUT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.59% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.20% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.85% | — |
PFUT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFUT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.99% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFUT and COMT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.
PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for PFUT and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer