PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSMX vs. PFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSMX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 13.93% return.


PFSMX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.90%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.11%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

PFFSX

1D
1.31%
1M
0.65%
YTD
13.93%
6M
12.93%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
7.70%12.09%20.94%14.51%-17.25%17.56%29.87%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
13.93%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSMX and PFFSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.93

The correlation between PFSMX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSMX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSMX
PFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSMXPFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.96

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

12.43

-4.92

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSMX and PFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than PFFSX's maximum drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSMX and PFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSMXPFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-24.92%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-10.11%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-21.45%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-24.92%

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.34%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-5.94%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.40%

-0.41%

Volatility

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) is 4.00%, while PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that PFSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSMXPFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

5.12%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.87%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

13.98%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.87%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

18.81%

+0.54%

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSMX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison

PFSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, less than PFFSX's 15.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.09%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
8.84%9.52%17.36%3.15%20.83%20.75%3.02%1.39%1.72%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSMX and PFFSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFSX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to PFSMX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSMX dropped -38.00% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSMX and PFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer