PFSMX vs. PFFSX
PFSMX (PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund) and PFFSX (PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PFSMX is a Global Equities fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group, while PFFSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group. Over the past 5 years, PFSMX returned 8.32%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for PFFSX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFSMX charges 2.05%/yr vs 2.03%/yr for PFFSX.
Performance
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFSMX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 13.93% return.
PFSMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFSX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 15.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund | 7.70% | 12.09% | 20.94% | 14.51% | -17.25% | 17.56% | 29.87% |
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 13.93% | 16.17% | 30.14% | 18.01% | -11.57% | 26.30% | 24.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFSMX and PFFSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PFSMX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFSMX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank
PFSMX
PFFSX
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFSMX | PFFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.96 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 12.43 | -4.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than PFFSX's maximum drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSMX and PFFSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFSMX | PFFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -24.92% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -10.11% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.29% | -21.45% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -24.92% | -13.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -1.34% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -5.94% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.40% | -0.41% |
Volatility
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) is 4.00%, while PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that PFSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFSMX | PFFSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 5.12% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.87% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 13.98% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 18.87% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 18.81% | +0.54% |
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFSMX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFSMX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison
PFSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, less than PFFSX's 15.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 15.09% | 17.19% | 19.78% | 2.40% | 10.90% | 6.73% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund | 8.84% | 9.52% | 17.36% | 3.15% | 20.83% | 20.75% | 3.02% | 1.39% | 1.72% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFSMX and PFFSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFSX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to PFSMX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSMX dropped -38.00% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.
PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFSMX and PFFSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer