PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFSX vs. PFTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFSX achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly higher than PFTEX's 9.60% return.


PFFSX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.88%
YTD
14.00%
6M
14.94%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*

PFTEX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.84%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
14.00%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
9.60%13.11%13.02%12.53%-13.13%11.68%17.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFSX and PFTEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.92

The correlation between PFFSX and PFTEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFSX vs. PFTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PFTEX
PFTEX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PFTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFSXPFTEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

2.20

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.08

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.70

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

12.25

+1.08

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the PFTEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFSX and PFTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFSXPFTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.20

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.46

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.42

+0.57

Drawdowns

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFSX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, which is greater than PFTEX's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFSX and PFTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFSXPFTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.92%

-19.72%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-8.88%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-15.53%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-17.99%

-6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-5.40%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.96%

+0.39%

Volatility

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) is 2.68%, while PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that PFFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFSXPFTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

3.05%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

8.53%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

11.02%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

15.98%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

14.54%

+4.26%

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFTEX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Dividend Comparison

PFFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than PFTEX's 8.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.08%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFTEX
PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund
8.62%9.45%3.38%2.23%18.46%2.00%1.00%0.15%0.18%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PFFSX and PFTEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFTEX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to PFFSX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFSX dropped -24.92% vs PFTEX's -19.72%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFSX and PFTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer