PFFSX vs. PFTEX
PFFSX (PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund) and PFTEX (PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PFFSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group, while PFTEX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group. Over the past 5 years, PFFSX returned 15.14%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for PFTEX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFFSX charges 2.03%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for PFTEX.
Performance
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFSX achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than PFTEX's 9.23% return.
PFFSX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- —
PFTEX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 13.56% | 16.17% | 30.14% | 18.01% | -11.57% | 26.30% | 24.12% |
PFTEX PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund | 9.23% | 13.11% | 13.02% | 12.53% | -13.13% | 11.68% | 16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFSX and PFTEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PFFSX and PFTEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFSX vs. PFTEX — Risk / Return Rank
PFFSX
PFTEX
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) and PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFFSX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.58 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 11.50 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFSX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, which is greater than PFTEX's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFSX and PFTEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFSX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -19.72% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -8.88% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -15.53% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.92% | -17.99% | -6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -0.60% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -5.37% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.99% | +0.41% |
Volatility
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Volatility Comparison
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund (PFTEX) at 4.24%. This indicates that PFFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFSX | PFTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 4.24% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 9.23% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 11.57% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 16.07% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 14.56% | +4.25% |
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFTEX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFSX vs. PFTEX - Dividend Comparison
PFFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.14%, more than PFTEX's 8.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFSX PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund | 15.14% | 17.19% | 19.78% | 2.40% | 10.90% | 6.73% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFTEX PFG Meeder Tactical Strategy Fund | 8.65% | 9.45% | 3.38% | 2.23% | 18.46% | 2.00% | 1.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PFFSX and PFTEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PFFSX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to PFTEX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFSX dropped -24.92% vs PFTEX's -19.72%.
PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFSX and PFTEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer