PFSEX vs. VGPMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PFSEX (PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund) and VGPMX (Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PFSEX returned 8.32%/yr vs 20.65%/yr for VGPMX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PFSEX charges 2.05%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for VGPMX.

Performance

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 16.88% return.

PFSEX

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: 5.13%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 1Y: 18.02%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.93%

VGPMX

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 6.45%
• YTD: 16.88%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 27.54%
• 5Y*: 20.65%
• 10Y*: 9.11%
• ALL TIME*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PFSEX PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFSEX PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund	7.82%	17.66%	15.07%	19.04%	-17.22%	17.81%	11.91%	22.25%	-15.09%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	16.88%	65.96%	5.78%	10.06%	7.34%	19.50%	17.21%	20.67%	-15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and VGPMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018	0.79

The correlation between PFSEX and VGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFSEX

PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 39
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VGPMX

VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFSEX	VGPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	3.13	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	3.78	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.53	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	4.42	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.69	14.96	-8.27

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and VGPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFSEX	VGPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-78.85%	+45.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	-12.80%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.47%	-14.63%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.41%	-22.71%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-3.52%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-34.44%	+27.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	3.77%	-1.37%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFSEX	VGPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	4.49%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.48%	15.24%	-3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	18.11%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	17.49%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.44%	20.63%	-2.19%

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.10%, more than VGPMX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFSEX PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund	16.10%	17.36%	1.71%	0.00%	6.35%	5.13%	0.00%	0.00%	3.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	3.34%	2.59%	2.68%	3.22%	3.27%	3.26%	2.03%	2.39%	3.02%	0.02%	1.72%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFSEX and VGPMX in my portfolio?

PFSEX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFSEX or VGPMX?

VGPMX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PFSEX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.