PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSEX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return.


PFSEX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.36%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
10.53%17.66%15.07%19.04%-17.22%17.81%11.91%22.25%-15.09%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and VGPMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.79

The correlation between PFSEX and VGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSEX
PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSEXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.69

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

5.25

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

21.90

-10.52

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSEXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

4.02

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.19

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.26

+0.25

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSEXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-78.85%

+45.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-12.80%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-14.63%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-22.71%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-34.55%

+27.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.06%

-0.82%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) is 3.60%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that PFSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSEXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.98%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

13.83%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

16.76%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

17.38%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

20.87%

-2.41%

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSEX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, more than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
15.71%17.36%1.71%0.00%6.35%5.13%0.00%0.00%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSEX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to PFSEX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSEX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer