PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSEX vs. PFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than PFFSX's 14.00% return.


PFSEX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.00%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*

PFFSX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.88%
YTD
14.00%
6M
14.94%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
10.10%17.66%15.07%19.04%-17.22%17.81%36.97%
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
14.00%16.17%30.14%18.01%-11.57%26.30%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and PFFSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.93

The correlation between PFSEX and PFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. PFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSEX
PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFSX
PFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSEXPFFSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

2.36

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

3.17

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.10

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.41

13.33

-1.92

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the PFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and PFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSEXPFFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.36

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.99

-0.48

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than PFFSX's maximum drawdown of -24.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and PFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSEXPFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-24.92%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-10.11%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-21.45%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-24.92%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-5.98%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.35%

-0.11%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Volatility Comparison

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund (PFFSX) at 2.68%. This indicates that PFSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSEXPFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.68%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

9.93%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

13.41%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

18.77%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

18.80%

-0.33%

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFSX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSEX vs. PFFSX - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.77%, more than PFFSX's 15.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFSX
PFG Sector Equity Business Cycle Strategy Fund
15.08%17.19%19.78%2.40%10.90%6.73%5.51%0.00%0.00%
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
15.77%17.36%1.71%0.00%6.35%5.13%0.00%0.00%3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PFSEX and PFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFSEX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PFFSX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs PFFSX's -24.92%.

PFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSEX and PFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer