PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSEX vs. SGSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than SGSCX's 20.12% return.


PFSEX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.36%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

SGSCX

1D
1.02%
1M
2.86%
YTD
20.12%
6M
22.38%
1Y
42.99%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
10.53%17.66%15.07%19.04%-17.22%17.81%11.91%22.25%-15.09%
SGSCX
DWS Global Small Cap Fund
20.12%20.22%5.35%24.62%-24.63%15.10%16.98%22.29%-23.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and SGSCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.89

The correlation between PFSEX and SGSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. SGSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSEX
PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SGSCX
SGSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SGSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SGSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSEXSGSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.62

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

17.61

-6.22

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SGSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and SGSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSEXSGSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.88

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.49

+0.03

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum SGSCX drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and SGSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSEXSGSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-62.26%

+28.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-9.54%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-22.37%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-33.72%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-14.12%

+7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.50%

-0.26%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) is 3.60%, while DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that PFSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSEXSGSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.04%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

11.55%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

15.31%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

18.88%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

19.53%

-1.07%

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SGSCX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSEX vs. SGSCX - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, more than SGSCX's 8.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
15.71%17.36%1.71%0.00%6.35%5.13%0.00%0.00%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGSCX
DWS Global Small Cap Fund
8.63%10.37%6.35%5.12%5.42%16.72%0.36%0.29%18.31%11.13%7.52%6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSEX and SGSCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGSCX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PFSEX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs SGSCX's -62.26%.

SGSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSEX and SGSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer