SGSCX vs. MGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX).
SGSCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Sep 9, 1991. MGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 14, 1995.
Performance
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 5.08% | 20.22% | 5.35% | 24.62% | -24.63% | 15.10% | 16.98% | 22.29% | -21.96% | 19.80% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 0.35% | 14.73% | 3.56% | 9.15% | -6.87% | 6.36% | 2.26% | 12.61% | 0.33% | 13.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGSCX achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than MGINX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SGSCX has outperformed MGINX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while MGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.
SGSCX
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 33.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
MGINX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGSCX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MGINX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGSCX vs. MGINX — Risk / Return Rank
SGSCX
MGINX
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGSCX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.52 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.15 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.73 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 7.72 | +2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGSCX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.52 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.64 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.79 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGSCX and MGINX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Dividend Comparison
SGSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than MGINX's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 9.87% | 10.37% | 6.35% | 5.12% | 5.42% | 16.72% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 18.31% | 11.13% | 7.52% | 6.04% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 2.25% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.88% | 4.76% | 1.20% | 0.81% | 3.23% | 6.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGSCX drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MGINX drawdown of -63.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGSCX and MGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGSCX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -63.39% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -7.01% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.72% | -12.16% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.98% | -15.12% | -30.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -5.25% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -13.83% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 1.57% | +1.34% |
Volatility
SGSCX vs. MGINX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) at 3.52%. This indicates that SGSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGSCX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 3.52% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 5.88% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.23% | 8.03% | +10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 6.67% | +12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 7.50% | +11.96% |