PFSEX vs. NVDA
PFSEX (PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PFSEX returned 8.71%/yr vs 67.45%/yr for NVDA. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return.
PFSEX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- 19.48%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 62.23%
- 3Y*
- 78.33%
- 5Y*
- 67.45%
- 10Y*
- 69.46%
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFSEX PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund | 10.10% | 17.66% | 15.07% | 19.04% | -17.22% | 17.81% | 11.91% | 22.25% | -15.09% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 19.48% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -51.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFSEX and NVDA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PFSEX and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFSEX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
PFSEX
NVDA
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFSEX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 1.84 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 2.47 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.21 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 7.92 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFSEX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.84 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.31 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.63 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFSEX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -89.72% | +55.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -20.21% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -36.88% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | -66.34% | +37.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.48% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -36.21% | +29.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 8.20% | -5.96% |
Volatility
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) is 3.60%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that PFSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFSEX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 11.79% | -8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 25.29% | -15.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 34.03% | -21.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 51.66% | -35.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 49.80% | -31.33% |
Dividends
PFSEX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.77%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
PFSEX PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund | 15.77% | 17.36% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 6.35% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFSEX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to PFSEX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
PFSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFSEX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer