PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSEX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return.


PFSEX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.00%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
10.10%17.66%15.07%19.04%-17.22%17.81%11.91%22.25%-15.09%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-51.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and NVDA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.63

The correlation between PFSEX and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSEX
PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSEXNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.84

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.47

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.21

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.41

7.92

+3.49

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSEXNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.84

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.31

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSEXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-89.72%

+55.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-20.21%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-36.88%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-66.34%

+37.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.48%

+5.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-36.21%

+29.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

8.20%

-5.96%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) is 3.60%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that PFSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSEXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

11.79%

-8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

25.29%

-15.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

34.03%

-21.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

51.66%

-35.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

49.80%

-31.33%

Dividends

PFSEX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.77%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
15.77%17.36%1.71%0.00%6.35%5.13%0.00%0.00%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSEX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to PFSEX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

PFSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSEX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer