PFRL vs. FLRT

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFRL returned 8.00%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for FLRT. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PFRL charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

PFRL vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.55% return.

PFRL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 3.38%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 1Y: 5.76%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.99%

FLRT

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 2.37%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 4.78%
• ALL TIME*: 4.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF	$5.77M	$4.99M	$4.79M
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	$1.36M	$1.00M	$754.82K

PFRL vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	3.12%	6.25%	9.40%	13.75%	1.27%
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF	2.55%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PFRL and FLRT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2022	0.34

Return for Risk

PFRL vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFRL

PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 93
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 88
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFRL vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFRL	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	3.47	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	5.20	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.76	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.61	2.92	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.65	10.71	+4.94

PFRL vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFRL vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFRL	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-20.96%	+12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.25%	-1.78%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.83%	-2.87%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.05%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-1.39%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.48%	-0.11%

Volatility

PFRL vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.31%. This indicates that PFRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFRL	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.57%	0.31%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.51%	1.16%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96%	1.50%	+0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.77%	2.30%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	6.09%	-1.32%

PFRL vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFRL vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than FLRT's 6.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF	6.71%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	6.48%	7.34%	8.96%	9.84%	3.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFRL and FLRT in my portfolio?

PFRL and FLRT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFRL or FLRT?

PFRL has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to FLRT (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFRL dropped -8.83% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which ETF is better, PFRL or FLRT?

On 3-year performance, PFRL leads with 8.00% vs 7.93% for FLRT. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFRL or FLRT?

Over the 3-year period, PFRL has performed better with a 8.00% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFRL or FLRT?

FLRT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFRL or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 6.48% for PFRL.

What is the main difference between PFRL and FLRT?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for PFRL and 0.60% for FLRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.