PFOE vs. TDVG
PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFOE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while TDVG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.
Performance
PFOE vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFOE achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.
PFOE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TDVG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $315.87K | $800.41K | $1.21M | |
| $2.11M | $3.07M | $2.63M |
PFOE vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | -9.13% | -1.29% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 10.93% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFOE and TDVG is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFOE vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank
PFOE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDVG
PFOE vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFOE | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFOE vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and TDVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFOE | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -19.20% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -0.92% | -13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -3.67% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
PFOE vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFOE | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 9.74% | +8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 13.87% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 13.81% | +4.65% |
PFOE vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFOE vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison
PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.96% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFOE and TDVG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFOE.
TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.22% for PFOE.
PFOE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TDVG is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.50% for TDVG.
Find the right allocation for PFOE and TDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer