PFLRX vs. PLFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX).
PFLRX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Aug 3, 2004. PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011.
Performance
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | -1.61% | 4.74% | 6.34% | 11.01% | -2.78% | 3.04% | 0.69% | 8.14% | -0.66% | 3.28% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLRX achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than PLFRX's -1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLRX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 3.79%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.04% annualized return.
PFLRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFLRX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
PFLRX
PLFRX
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.96 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 3.42 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.61 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.90 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 9.49 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.96 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | 2.05 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.43 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLRX and PLFRX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison
PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than PLFRX's 6.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLRX Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.38% | 6.69% | 6.25% | 7.27% | 3.48% | 2.63% | 3.10% | 4.56% | 4.54% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 4.45% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.89%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and PLFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.89% | -18.75% | -14.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -1.82% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.95% | -6.44% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.74% | -18.75% | -1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -1.55% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -0.73% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.56% | +0.10% |
Volatility
PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) have volatilities of 0.77% and 0.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFLRX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 0.76% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 1.79% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 2.76% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.81% | 2.74% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 3.75% | +0.26% |