PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLRX vs. PLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLRX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than PLFRX's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLRX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 3.63%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.03% annualized return.


PFLRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.13%
6M
0.61%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
3.63%
ALL TIME*
3.55%

PLFRX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.54%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
5.03%
ALL TIME*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
0.55%4.74%6.34%11.01%-2.78%3.04%0.69%8.14%-0.66%3.28%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
1.54%6.68%8.38%13.94%-2.01%4.36%1.26%8.30%0.39%4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLRX and PLFRX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2011

0.61

The correlation between PFLRX and PLFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLRX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFLRX
PFLRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PFLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PLFRX
PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFLRXPLFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.61

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.67

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

8.98

-5.88

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the PLFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLRX and PLFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.89%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and PLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLRXPLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.89%

-18.75%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-1.73%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.01%

-2.17%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.95%

-6.44%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.74%

-18.75%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.11%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-0.72%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.51%

+0.23%

Volatility

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) has a higher volatility of 0.30% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.25%. This indicates that PFLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLRXPLFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.25%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

1.84%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

2.42%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

2.80%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

3.77%

+0.25%

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLRX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison

PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than PLFRX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
5.68%6.69%6.25%7.27%3.48%2.63%3.10%4.56%4.54%3.69%3.71%4.45%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
6.36%7.18%8.47%8.92%4.39%3.65%3.68%5.10%5.03%4.46%4.21%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLRX and PLFRX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFLRX has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to PLFRX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLRX dropped -32.89% vs PLFRX's -18.75%.

PLFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLRX and PLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer