PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLRX vs. DFLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLRX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than DFLYX's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLRX has underperformed DFLYX with an annualized return of 3.74%, while DFLYX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.95% annualized return.


PFLRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
3.74%

DFLYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
0.26%4.74%6.34%11.01%-2.78%3.04%0.69%8.14%-0.66%3.28%
DFLYX
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund
1.81%4.84%9.77%13.29%-1.15%4.84%2.66%7.15%-0.58%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLRX and DFLYX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.56

The correlation between PFLRX and DFLYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLRX vs. DFLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLRX
PFLRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PFLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLYX
DFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) and BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLRXDFLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.03

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.96

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

11.15

-6.49

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the DFLYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLRX and DFLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLRXDFLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

3.79

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

3.13

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.63

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.53

-0.57

Drawdowns

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.89%, which is greater than DFLYX's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLRX and DFLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLRXDFLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.89%

-18.83%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-1.71%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.01%

-2.49%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.95%

-6.28%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.74%

-18.83%

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-0.79%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.45%

+0.28%

Volatility

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund (PFLRX) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) at 0.31%. This indicates that PFLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLRXDFLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.31%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

1.14%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

1.34%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

1.93%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

3.05%

+0.97%

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLRX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DFLYX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLRX vs. DFLYX - Dividend Comparison

PFLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, less than DFLYX's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLYX
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund
7.82%7.50%8.78%8.78%5.49%4.22%4.66%5.54%5.19%3.77%4.14%4.65%
PFLRX
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund
6.28%6.69%6.25%7.27%3.48%2.63%3.10%4.56%4.54%3.69%3.71%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLRX and DFLYX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFLRX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to DFLYX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLRX dropped -32.89% vs DFLYX's -18.83%.

DFLYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLRX and DFLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer