DFLYX vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DFLYX (BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both funds - DFLYX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Dreyfus, while FLRT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Pacific Life. Over the past 10 years, DFLYX returned 4.96%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFLYX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFLYX having a 1.90% return and FLRT slightly lower at 1.88%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFLYX having a 4.96% annualized return and FLRT not far behind at 4.91%.

DFLYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: 8.08%
• 5Y*: 5.95%
• 10Y*: 4.96%

FLRT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFLYX BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund	1.90%	4.84%	9.77%	13.29%	-1.15%	4.84%	2.66%	7.15%	-0.58%	3.48%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.88%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	-2.72%	3.18%	2.78%	9.44%	-1.14%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLYX and FLRT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015	0.34

The correlation between DFLYX and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFLYX vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLYX

DFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
DFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFLYX	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.59	3.59	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.87	5.55	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.94	1.85	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.22	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.72	11.76	-1.05

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is comparable to the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLYX and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLYX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLYX and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFLYX	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.83%	-20.96%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-1.78%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.49%	-2.87%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.28%	-7.60%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.83%	-20.96%	+2.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-1.41%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.49%	-0.04%

Volatility

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) is 0.32%, while Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that DFLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFLYX	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	0.43%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.12%	1.22%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36%	1.60%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.93%	2.30%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.05%	6.12%	-3.07%

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLYX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFLYX vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

DFLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than FLRT's 6.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFLYX BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund	7.81%	7.50%	8.78%	8.78%	5.49%	4.22%	4.66%	5.54%	5.19%	3.77%	4.14%	4.65%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.80%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFLYX and FLRT in my portfolio?

DFLYX and FLRT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFLYX or FLRT?

FLRT has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to DFLYX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLYX dropped -18.83% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.