DFLYX vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
DFLYX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Sep 26, 2013. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Performance
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFLYX BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund | -0.42% | 4.84% | 9.77% | 13.29% | -1.15% | 4.84% | 2.66% | 7.15% | -0.58% | 3.48% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | -0.20% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFLYX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's -0.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFLYX having a 4.95% annualized return and FLRT not far behind at 4.94%.
DFLYX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.95%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFLYX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFLYX vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
DFLYX
FLRT
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFLYX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 1.80 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 2.31 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.56 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.15 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 8.63 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFLYX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.80 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.03 | 2.47 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.63 | 0.79 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.73 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFLYX and FLRT is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
DFLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than FLRT's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFLYX BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund | 7.54% | 7.50% | 8.78% | 8.78% | 5.49% | 4.22% | 4.66% | 5.54% | 5.19% | 3.77% | 4.14% | 4.65% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.92% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFLYX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLYX and FLRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFLYX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -20.96% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.71% | -2.47% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.28% | -7.60% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.83% | -20.96% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.88% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -1.43% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.62% | -0.11% |
Volatility
DFLYX vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) has a higher volatility of 0.59% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.46%. This indicates that DFLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFLYX | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 0.46% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 1.22% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99% | 3.04% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 2.32% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.05% | 6.24% | -3.19% |