PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLD vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLD vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 57.84% return.


PFLD

1D
0.02%
1M
0.43%
6M
2.31%
YTD
2.86%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*

TRMD

1D
1.96%
1M
-3.21%
6M
31.84%
YTD
57.84%
1Y
82.70%
3Y*
24.24%
5Y*
45.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLD vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
2.86%1.44%5.48%8.16%-12.73%4.49%5.34%0.86%
TRMD
TORM plc
57.84%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%12.91%-25.94%23.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLD and TRMD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLD vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFLDTRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.53

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

9.19

+3.12

PFLD vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLD and TRMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFLD vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum TRMD drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and TRMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLDTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-60.59%

+27.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-23.53%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-60.59%

+54.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

-60.59%

+45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-13.65%

+13.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-22.49%

+18.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

9.03%

-8.55%

Volatility

PFLD vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 0.68%, while TORM plc (TRMD) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLDTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

13.32%

-12.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

29.03%

-26.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

38.24%

-35.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

46.27%

-38.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

59.68%

-46.41%

Dividends

PFLD vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than TRMD's 8.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.46%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%
TRMD
TORM plc
8.22%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLD and TRMD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMD has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to PFLD (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs TRMD's -60.59%.

TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLD and TRMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer