PFLD vs. PFXF
PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) and PFXF (VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PFLD tracks the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index while PFXF tracks the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFLD returned 1.02%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for PFXF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for PFXF.
Performance
PFLD vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 8.59% return.
PFLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.42%
PFLD vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.58% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 8.59% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 11.20% | -18.83% | 11.61% | 7.61% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLD and PFXF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFLD and PFXF has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFLD vs. PFXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFLD
PFXF
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
PFLD
PFXF
Basic Materials
PFLD
-
PFXF
-
Communication Services
PFLD
-
PFXF
Consumer Cyclical
PFLD
-
PFXF
Consumer Defensive
PFLD
-
PFXF
Energy
PFLD
-
PFXF
Financial Services
PFLD
-
PFXF
Healthcare
PFLD
-
PFXF
Industrials
PFLD
-
PFXF
Real Estate
PFLD
-
PFXF
Technology
PFLD
-
PFXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLD vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank
PFLD
PFXF
PFLD vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.13 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.38 | 11.03 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.05 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.41 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.49 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PFLD vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and PFXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -35.49% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -5.83% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.41% | -11.90% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.51% | -21.80% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.90% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.91% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 1.65% | -1.15% |
Volatility
PFLD vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 0.83%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 3.08% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 6.69% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 8.93% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 10.91% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 13.21% | +0.16% |
PFLD vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFLD vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison
PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, less than PFXF's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.08% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFLD and PFXF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFXF has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to PFLD (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs PFXF's -35.49%.
On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.49% vs 1.02% for PFLD. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.
PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.
PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.41% for PFXF.
PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFLD and PFXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer