PFLD vs. IBIC
PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFLD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PFLD returned 5.71% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
PFLD vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.
PFLD
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.58% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 2.72% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLD and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between PFLD and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLD vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
PFLD
IBIC
PFLD vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFLD | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 2.21 | -0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 16.41 | -13.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 58.11 | -46.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFLD vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLD | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -0.90% | -32.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -0.27% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.11% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -0.10% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.08% | +0.42% |
Volatility
PFLD vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that PFLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLD | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.16% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.27% | 0.67% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 0.89% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.51% | 1.57% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 1.57% | +11.75% |
PFLD vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFLD vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFLD and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFLD has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, PFLD leads with 5.71% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PFLD has performed better with a 5.71% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.
PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
PFLD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFLD and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer