PFLD vs. GPRF
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF).
PFLD and GPRF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFLD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2019. GPRF is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. Both PFLD and GPRF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PFLD vs. GPRF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFLD vs. GPRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 0.71% | 1.44% | 0.78% |
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | -0.41% | 6.17% | 2.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than GPRF's -0.41% return.
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GPRF
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFLD vs. GPRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PFLD and GPRF have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Return for Risk
PFLD vs. GPRF — Risk / Return Rank
PFLD
GPRF
PFLD vs. GPRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLD | GPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 1.23 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 1.69 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.25 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 5.64 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLD | GPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.23 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.21 | -1.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFLD and GPRF is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFLD vs. GPRF - Dividend Comparison
PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than GPRF's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 6.02% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% |
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.61% | 5.38% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PFLD vs. GPRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than GPRF's maximum drawdown of -4.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and GPRF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLD | GPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -4.36% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.06% | -4.20% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -2.48% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -0.88% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.93% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PFLD vs. GPRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 1.25%, while Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFLD | GPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 2.37% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.27% | 3.12% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 4.17% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 4.03% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 4.03% | +9.51% |