PFLD vs. EEMD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) and EEMD (AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFLD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while EEMD is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EEMD.

Performance

PFLD vs. EEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: 5.14%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: —

EEMD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLD vs. EEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A	2.61%	1.44%	5.48%	8.16%	-12.73%	4.49%	5.34%	0.86%
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	9.61%	17.60%	-11.21%	5.54%	-0.35%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLD and EEMD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019	0.29

Return for Risk

PFLD vs. EEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD

PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 57
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. EEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFLD	EEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFLD	EEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFLD	EEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.51%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	—	—

PFLD vs. EEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMD's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFLD vs. EEMD - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, while EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%	8.41%	7.66%	6.34%	3.84%	5.35%	4.91%	0.42%
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A	5.60%	6.52%	7.09%	7.09%	5.76%	4.52%	4.79%	0.82%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFLD and EEMD in my portfolio?

PFLD and EEMD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFLD or EEMD?

On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFLD or EEMD?

PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFLD or EEMD?

PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.

What is the main difference between PFLD and EEMD?

PFLD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while EEMD is Emerging Markets Equities. PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while EEMD tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.50% for EEMD.