PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMD vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMD vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EEMD

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

VWO

1D
0.96%
1M
-0.49%
6M
4.16%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$386.61M$469.40M$499.89M

EEMD vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%9.61%17.60%-11.21%5.54%-0.35%12.55%-14.57%5.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.41%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMD and VWO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.67

The correlation between EEMD and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMD vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMD
VWO

Utilities

11.3%
2.8%

Energy

10.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

9.8%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
3.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.7%

Communication Services

9.1%
6.6%

Financial Services

9.0%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.1%

Industrials

8.2%
7.9%

Basic Materials

7.4%
7.2%

Technology

6.6%
34.2%

Utilities

EEMD
11.3%
VWO
2.8%

Energy

EEMD
10.6%
VWO
3.8%

Real Estate

EEMD
9.8%
VWO
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

EEMD
9.7%
VWO
3.3%

Healthcare

EEMD
9.5%
VWO
3.7%

Communication Services

EEMD
9.1%
VWO
6.6%

Financial Services

EEMD
9.0%
VWO
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMD
8.8%
VWO
9.1%

Industrials

EEMD
8.2%
VWO
7.9%

Basic Materials

EEMD
7.4%
VWO
7.2%

Technology

EEMD
6.6%
VWO
34.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMD vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMD vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMDVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

EEMD vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMD vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMDVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

Volatility

EEMD vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMDVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

EEMD vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMD vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%4.03%8.41%7.66%6.34%3.84%5.35%4.91%0.42%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMD and VWO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMD.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.

EEMD tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMD and 0.08% for VWO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMD and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer