PFL vs. FSCO
PFL (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, PFL returned 10.21%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for FSCO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFL vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -19.42% return.
PFL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
FSCO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -19.42%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- -24.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFL vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | -3.63% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -2.06% |
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | -19.42% | 3.68% | 34.88% | 36.98% | -3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL and FSCO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2022 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank
PFL
FSCO
PFL vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFL | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.85 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | -0.69 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | -1.34 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFL vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than FSCO's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and FSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -35.53% | -42.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -35.53% | +27.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.21% | -35.53% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -29.65% | +24.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -8.18% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 18.22% | -15.57% |
Volatility
PFL vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) is 2.92%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that PFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFL | FSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 5.88% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 22.61% | -14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 27.44% | -18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 28.15% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 28.15% | -9.81% |
Dividends
PFL vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison
PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.77%, less than FSCO's 16.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | 16.36% | 12.65% | 10.47% | 11.26% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | 12.77% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFL and FSCO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCO has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to PFL (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFL dropped -77.97% vs FSCO's -35.53%.
PFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFL and FSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer