FSCO vs. ARCC
FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, FSCO returned 11.66%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for ARCC. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FSCO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCO achieves a -14.85% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's -2.30% return.
FSCO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- -12.54%
- YTD
- -14.85%
- 1Y
- -24.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.86%
ARCC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- -7.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $81.64M | $84.10M | $93.93M | |
| $4.16M | $4.36M | $5.06M |
FSCO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | -14.85% | 3.68% | 34.88% | 36.98% | -3.98% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.30% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCO and ARCC is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2022 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
FSCO:
$1.00B
ARCC:
$13.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
FSCO
ARCC
FSCO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSCO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.94 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.50 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -0.91 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSCO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCO drawdown since its inception was -35.53%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCO and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.53% | -79.36% | +43.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.53% | -17.35% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.53% | -19.35% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.65% | -11.07% | -14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -9.12% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.18% | 9.51% | +10.67% |
Volatility
FSCO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) is 3.72%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that FSCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 4.33% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | 14.79% | +7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.60% | 18.86% | +8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 19.97% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 25.58% | +2.28% |
Dividends
FSCO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
FSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, more than ARCC's 10.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.23% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp. | 15.48% | 12.65% | 10.47% | 11.26% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSCO vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FS Credit Opportunities Corp. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCO and ARCC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCC has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FSCO (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCO dropped -35.53% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
ARCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCO and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer