PFL vs. MMT
PFL (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund) and MMT (MFS Multimarket Income Trust) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PFL returned 8.97%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for MMT. At 0.27, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFL vs. MMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than MMT's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PFL has outperformed MMT with an annualized return of 8.97%, while MMT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.71% annualized return.
PFL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
MMT
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
PFL vs. MMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | -1.19% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -17.92% | 4.62% | 7.11% | 19.65% | 2.06% | 21.26% |
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust | 2.62% | 8.10% | 12.40% | 10.14% | -22.96% | 13.11% | 8.88% | 30.32% | -7.70% | 9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL and MMT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL vs. MMT — Risk / Return Rank
PFL
MMT
PFL vs. MMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFL | MMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 2.03 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 3.13 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.31 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 9.62 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFL | MMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.03 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.16 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
PFL vs. MMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than MMT's maximum drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and MMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL | MMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -35.70% | -42.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -4.90% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -32.29% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.40% | -35.70% | -12.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -1.08% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -5.26% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.69% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PFL vs. MMT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) at 4.33%. This indicates that PFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFL | MMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 4.33% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 6.52% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 8.58% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 11.66% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 14.27% | +4.08% |
Dividends
PFL vs. MMT - Dividend Comparison
PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than MMT's 8.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | 11.07% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust | 8.62% | 8.65% | 8.65% | 8.65% | 9.38% | 7.86% | 8.07% | 8.16% | 9.86% | 8.83% | 8.71% | 9.05% |