PFL vs. PDI
Compare and contrast key facts about Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI).
Performance
PFL vs. PDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFL vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL Perpetual Global Income Fund | 1.21% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -17.92% | 4.62% | 7.11% | 19.65% | 2.06% | 21.26% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 0.17% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
Returns By Period
PFL
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDI
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- -0.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank
PFL
PDI
PFL vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFL | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.59 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL and PDI is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFL vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison
PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, less than PDI's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL Perpetual Global Income Fund | 9.63% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 15.46% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
Drawdowns
PFL vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -46.47% | -31.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -14.34% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -27.23% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.40% | -46.47% | -1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.66% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -6.22% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 5.03% | -3.19% |
Volatility
PFL vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFL | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.36% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.66% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.06% | — |