PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFL vs. PFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFL vs. PFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFL vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFL
Perpetual Global Income Fund
1.21%13.03%11.51%17.29%-17.92%4.62%7.11%19.65%2.06%21.26%
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
-5.40%13.07%15.72%15.43%-17.65%5.14%3.97%21.84%0.94%20.58%

Returns By Period


PFL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFN

1D
3.77%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFL vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

PFL vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFL
PFL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PFN
PFN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFL vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perpetual Global Income Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PFL vs. PFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLPFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Correlation

The correlation between PFL and PFN is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PFL vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison

PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, less than PFN's 12.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFL
Perpetual Global Income Fund
9.63%11.59%11.66%11.57%12.04%9.53%9.44%9.11%9.94%9.25%10.22%11.09%
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
12.51%11.49%11.57%11.92%12.19%9.71%9.67%9.07%10.81%9.20%10.12%11.74%

Drawdowns

PFL vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLPFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.97%

-80.08%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-10.77%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-33.45%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.40%

-45.70%

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.42%

+6.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-11.89%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.79%

-0.95%

Volatility

PFL vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFLPFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%