PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PFIG vs. FLRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PFIG vs. FLRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - PFIG tracks the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index while FLRN tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFIG returned 2.44%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLRN.

Performance

PFIG vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PFIG has underperformed FLRN with an annualized return of 2.44%, while FLRN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.03% annualized return.

PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.44%

FLRN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		0.19%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%9.69%-0.82%4.00%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF		1.87%5.01%6.32%6.54%1.31%0.39%0.77%4.02%1.39%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and FLRN is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

Often compared with PFIG:
PFIG vs. SGOVPFIG vs. PGHYPFIG vs. GABFPFIG vs. XLFPFIG vs. GDEPFIG vs. DBEFPFIG vs. BSJP
Often compared with FLRN:
FLRN vs. FLOTFLRN vs. TFLOFLRN vs. SGOVFLRN vs. PRFRXFLRN vs. USFRFLRN vs. VUBFXFLRN vs. BND

Return for Risk

PFIG vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PFIGFLRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

7.18

-5.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

13.18

-10.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

3.44

-2.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

21.54

-19.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

130.06

-121.86

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFIG vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and FLRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PFIGFLRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

7.18

-5.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

2.50

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.72

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than FLRN's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and FLRN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PFIGFLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-14.64%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-0.23%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

-1.43%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-2.16%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

-14.64%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.83%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.04%

+0.55%

Volatility

PFIG vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PFIGFLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.15%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.52%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

0.68%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

1.69%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

4.20%

+1.04%

PFIG vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PFIG vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than FLRN's 4.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF		4.51%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		4.40%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

PFIG and FLRN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIG has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs FLRN's -14.64%.

On 10-year performance, FLRN leads with 3.03% vs 2.44% for PFIG. On fees, FLRN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 3.03% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLRN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.40% for PFIG.

PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.15% for FLRN.

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and FLRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer