PFIG vs. GABF
PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. PFIG is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFIG returned 5.21%/yr vs 20.47%/yr for GABF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
PFIG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -7.03% return.
PFIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
GABF
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.19% | 7.87% | 3.13% | 6.93% | -1.56% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -7.03% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIG and GABF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.22 |
PFIG vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFIG
GABF
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
PFIG
GABF
Industrials
PFIG
GABF
Healthcare
PFIG
GABF
-
Technology
PFIG
GABF
Consumer Cyclical
PFIG
GABF
-
Consumer Defensive
PFIG
GABF
-
Energy
PFIG
GABF
-
Utilities
PFIG
GABF
-
Communication Services
PFIG
GABF
-
Real Estate
PFIG
GABF
Basic Materials
PFIG
GABF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
PFIG
GABF
PFIG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.98 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | -0.19 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | -0.44 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | -0.19 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.87 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
PFIG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -20.86% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -17.16% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | -20.86% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -11.60% | +10.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -4.86% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 7.27% | -6.68% |
Volatility
PFIG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) is 0.92%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that PFIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 4.28% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 13.14% | -10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 17.37% | -14.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 20.54% | -15.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 20.54% | -15.30% |
PFIG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PFIG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than GABF's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.11% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.15% | 4.12% | 3.54% | 2.58% | 3.34% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIG and GABF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to PFIG (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.47% vs 5.21% for PFIG. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PFIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.47% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.
PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.11% for GABF.
PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.10% for GABF.
PFIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIG and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer