PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. BSJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFIG

1D
0.09%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.46%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.42%

BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.31%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%9.69%-0.82%0.39%
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%16.89%-4.66%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and BSJP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between PFIG and BSJP has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIGBSJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

PFIG vs. BSJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGBSJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

Volatility

PFIG vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGBSJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

PFIG vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFIG vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than BSJP's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.89%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%0.00%0.00%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.42%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIG and BSJP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PFIG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PFIG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.

PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 1.89% for BSJP.

PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BSJP is High Yield Bonds. PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.42% for BSJP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and BSJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer