PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.


PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.44%

BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.69%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.19%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%9.69%-0.82%0.43%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and BSCR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.76

The correlation between PFIG and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFIG vs. BSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFIG
BSCR

Financial Services

15.2%
20.9%

Industrials

11.1%
6.6%

Healthcare

10.9%
10.4%

Technology

10.7%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.1%

Energy

5.6%
3.9%

Utilities

4.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
4.0%

Real Estate

4.2%
3.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

PFIG
15.2%
BSCR
20.9%

Industrials

PFIG
11.1%
BSCR
6.6%

Healthcare

PFIG
10.9%
BSCR
10.4%

Technology

PFIG
10.7%
BSCR
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PFIG
7.7%
BSCR
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

PFIG
6.3%
BSCR
5.1%

Energy

PFIG
5.6%
BSCR
3.9%

Utilities

PFIG
4.5%
BSCR
3.3%

Communication Services

PFIG
4.4%
BSCR
4.0%

Real Estate

PFIG
4.2%
BSCR
3.0%

Basic Materials

PFIG
3.0%
BSCR
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIGBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.14

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

11.08

-8.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

46.99

-38.79

PFIG vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIGBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

4.31

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.59

-0.07

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-17.26%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-0.42%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

-2.41%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-14.87%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-3.35%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.10%

+0.49%

Volatility

PFIG vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.19%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.59%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

1.08%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

4.09%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

5.35%

-0.11%

PFIG vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PFIG vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIG and BSCR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIG has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.41% vs 1.35% for PFIG. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.41% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer