PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.44%

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and BPH is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.94

PFIG vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFIG
BPH

Financial Services

15.2%

-

Industrials

11.1%

-

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Technology

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Energy

5.6%
100.0%

Utilities

4.5%

-

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Financial Services

PFIG
15.2%
BPH

-

Industrials

PFIG
11.1%
BPH

-

Healthcare

PFIG
10.9%
BPH

-

Technology

PFIG
10.7%
BPH

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFIG
7.7%
BPH

-

Consumer Defensive

PFIG
6.3%
BPH

-

Energy

PFIG
5.6%
BPH
100.0%

Utilities

PFIG
4.5%
BPH

-

Communication Services

PFIG
4.4%
BPH

-

Real Estate

PFIG
4.2%
BPH

-

Basic Materials

PFIG
3.0%
BPH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BPH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIGBPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

PFIG vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIGBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

9.48

-8.95

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-2.35%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.08%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

Volatility

PFIG vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGBPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

25.75%

-22.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

25.75%

-20.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

25.75%

-20.51%

PFIG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PFIG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIG and BPH have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer