PFIA.TO vs. TLT
PFIA.TO (Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIA.TO is a fund fund, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, PFIA.TO returned 3.36%/yr vs -3.57%/yr for TLT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PFIA.TO is traded in CAD, while TLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIA.TO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 1.32% return.
PFIA.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.55%
- 5Y*
- -3.57%
- 10Y*
- -0.75%
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | 0.42% | 5.46% | 7.72% | 7.27% | -3.42% | 3.17% | 9.28% | 3.68% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.32% | -0.53% | -0.15% | 0.50% | -26.33% | -5.46% | 16.16% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIA.TO and TLT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIA.TO vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
PFIA.TO
TLT
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIA.TO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.57 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 1.25 | +6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIA.TO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.51 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | -0.22 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.20 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIA.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.12%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -49.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIA.TO and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIA.TO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.12% | -49.81% | +32.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.36% | -9.23% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -16.36% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.46% | -39.82% | +33.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -41.18% | +40.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -18.25% | +17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 4.20% | -3.72% |
Volatility
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) is 1.14%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that PFIA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIA.TO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 2.63% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 7.42% | -5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 10.38% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 16.61% | -12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 16.32% | -9.92% |
Dividends
PFIA.TO vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
PFIA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than TLT's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | 4.49% | 3.96% | 3.68% | 5.64% | 4.69% | 4.25% | 6.03% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIA.TO and TLT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PFIA.TO and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer