PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO).
PFIA.TO and PFMN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.
Performance
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | -0.12% | 5.46% | 7.72% | 7.27% | -3.42% | 3.17% | 9.28% | 3.68% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | -0.40% | 4.86% | 15.06% | 3.13% | 5.43% | 6.10% | 16.70% | 1.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIA.TO achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than PFMN.TO's -0.40% return.
PFIA.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
PFMN.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PFIA.TO
PFMN.TO
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIA.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.00 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 1.51 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 1.49 | +2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 4.22 | +7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIA.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.00 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIA.TO and PFMN.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Dividend Comparison
PFIA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than PFMN.TO's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | 4.22% | 3.96% | 3.68% | 5.64% | 4.69% | 4.25% | 6.03% | 1.93% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIA.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.12%, which is greater than PFMN.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIA.TO and PFMN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIA.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.12% | -13.04% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -3.49% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.46% | -4.24% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -1.69% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -1.19% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 1.24% | -0.89% |
Volatility
PFIA.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) is 0.68%, while Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that PFIA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFMN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFIA.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 1.98% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 3.24% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 5.76% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 8.01% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 9.87% | -3.40% |