PFI vs. USVM
PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PFI tracks the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index while USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFI returned 6.05%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
PFI vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 20.14% return.
PFI
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- YTD
- 20.14%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PFI vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 7.70% | 1.98% | 30.58% | 12.58% | -24.09% | 28.70% | 13.85% | 36.54% | -17.18% | 4.06% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 20.14% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFI and USVM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PFI and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PFI vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFI
USVM
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PFI
USVM
Real Estate
PFI
USVM
Basic Materials
PFI
-
USVM
Communication Services
PFI
-
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
PFI
-
USVM
Consumer Defensive
PFI
-
USVM
Energy
PFI
-
USVM
Healthcare
PFI
-
USVM
Industrials
PFI
-
USVM
Technology
PFI
-
USVM
Utilities
PFI
-
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFI vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
PFI
USVM
PFI vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFI | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.37 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 3.71 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 13.98 | -11.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFI vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFI | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.53% | -42.38% | -17.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -8.36% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.82% | -24.34% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | -25.27% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.92% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.43% | -7.81% | -6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 2.21% | +2.37% |
Volatility
PFI vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 3.46%. This indicates that PFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFI | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 3.46% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 10.86% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 14.83% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 19.57% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 21.91% | +0.36% |
PFI vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFI vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than USVM's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 0.99% | 0.68% | 2.77% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 1.28% | 1.56% | 0.92% | 1.98% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 1.44% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.83% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFI and USVM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to USVM (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.31% vs 6.05% for PFI. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.31% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PFI.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.99% for PFI.
PFI tracks Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFI and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer