PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFI vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFI vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PFI has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 9.16%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.87% annualized return.


PFI

1D
1.10%
1M
4.05%
YTD
6.44%
6M
3.96%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.16%

KMB

1D
-2.01%
1M
2.76%
YTD
2.23%
6M
3.37%
1Y
-17.83%
3Y*
-6.09%
5Y*
-1.36%
10Y*
0.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFI vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF
6.44%1.98%30.58%12.58%-24.09%28.70%13.85%36.54%-17.18%15.00%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
2.23%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PFI and KMB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.34

The correlation between PFI and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFI vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFI
PFI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFI vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.89

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

-0.60

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

-0.91

+3.75

PFI vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFI and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFI vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.53%

-36.97%

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-29.60%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

-34.06%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

-34.06%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

-34.06%

-9.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-27.81%

+26.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-8.86%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

19.63%

-15.01%

Volatility

PFI vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) is 4.04%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that PFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

9.21%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

17.09%

-3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

25.95%

-7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

20.26%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

21.11%

+1.16%

Dividends

PFI vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than KMB's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
5.05%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF
1.10%0.68%2.77%1.85%1.93%1.28%1.56%0.92%1.98%0.35%2.16%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFI and KMB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to PFI (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs KMB's -36.97%.

PFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFI and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer