PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PFI vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PFI vs. ULVM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PFI tracks the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFI returned 5.43%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for ULVM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.

Performance

PFI vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 16.65% return.

PFI

1D
0.56%
1M
4.63%
YTD
7.04%
6M
4.43%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
9.22%

ULVM

1D
0.10%
1M
2.65%
YTD
16.65%
6M
15.46%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFI vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF		7.04%1.98%30.58%12.58%-24.09%28.70%13.85%36.54%-17.18%4.06%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF		16.65%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PFI and ULVM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.82

The correlation between PFI and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFI vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
PFI
ULVM

Financial Services

81.2%
22.6%

Real Estate

18.8%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

10.2%

Industrials

-

12.3%

Technology

-

13.5%

Utilities

-

12.2%

Financial Services

PFI
81.2%
ULVM
22.6%

Real Estate

PFI
18.8%
ULVM
8.5%

Basic Materials

PFI

-

ULVM
4.1%

Communication Services

PFI

-

ULVM
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PFI

-

ULVM
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

PFI

-

ULVM
4.6%

Energy

PFI

-

ULVM
3.3%

Healthcare

PFI

-

ULVM
10.2%

Industrials

PFI

-

ULVM
12.3%

Technology

PFI

-

ULVM
13.5%

Utilities

PFI

-

ULVM
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF

Often compared with PFI:
PFI vs. MBOXPFI vs. VFHPFI vs. KOPFI vs. KMBPFI vs. SMLVPFI vs. VOOPFI vs. FDGRX
Often compared with ULVM:
ULVM vs. SEIVULVM vs. SPMOULVM vs. SPYULVM vs. JPUSULVM vs. USVMULVM vs. FXAIXULVM vs. ONEV

Return for Risk

PFI vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PFI
PFI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFI vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PFIULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.66
2.65

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.99
3.75

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

4.46

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

18.39

-15.74

PFI vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFI and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFI vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and ULVM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PFIULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.53%

-40.71%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-6.47%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

-18.14%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

-19.77%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.52%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-5.72%

-8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

1.56%

+3.06%

Volatility

PFI vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 3.34%. This indicates that PFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PFIULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.34%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

8.31%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

10.92%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

15.48%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

18.82%

+3.44%

PFI vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFI vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than ULVM's 1.62% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF		1.00%0.68%2.77%1.85%1.93%1.28%1.56%0.92%1.98%0.35%2.16%1.44%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF		1.62%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PFI and ULVM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFI has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to ULVM (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 12.23% vs 5.43% for PFI. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 12.23% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PFI.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.00% for PFI.

PFI tracks Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFI and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer