PFI vs. SMOM
PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. PFI is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
PFI vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PFI having a 7.04% return and SMOM slightly lower at 7.03%.
PFI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
SMOM
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFI vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 7.04% | 1.68% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 7.03% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFI and SMOM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFI vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PFI
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PFI vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFI vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.53% | -7.45% | -52.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -2.54% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -1.49% | -12.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility
PFI vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 12.80% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 12.80% | +9.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 12.80% | +9.46% |
PFI vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFI vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 1.00% | 0.68% | 2.77% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 1.28% | 1.56% | 0.92% | 1.98% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 1.44% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFI and SMOM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
PFI has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
PFI is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for PFI and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer