PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFI vs. GSIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFI vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 23.08% return.


PFI

1D
1.27%
1M
3.00%
6M
9.38%
YTD
10.59%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.11%
ALL TIME*
6.34%

GSIB

1D
0.34%
1M
6.91%
6M
16.90%
YTD
23.08%
1Y
49.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
45.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86M$1.42M$773.56K
$678.29K$1.66M$620.79K

PFI vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF
10.59%1.98%30.58%0.86%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
23.08%61.67%32.86%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PFI and GSIB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.66

The correlation between PFI and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFI vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFI
GSIB

Financial Services

80.9%
99.6%

Real Estate

19.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PFI
80.9%
GSIB
99.6%

Real Estate

PFI
19.1%
GSIB

-

Basic Materials

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Communication Services

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Consumer Defensive

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Energy

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Healthcare

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Industrials

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Technology

PFI

-

GSIB
0.1%

Utilities

PFI

-

GSIB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFI vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFI
PFI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIB
GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFI vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIGSIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.58

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

12.59

-8.90

PFI vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFI and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFI vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and GSIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGSIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.53%

-17.71%

-41.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-13.90%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-1.99%

-12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

3.95%

+0.64%

Volatility

PFI vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) have volatilities of 5.99% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGSIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

5.73%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

14.90%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

17.83%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

18.45%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

18.45%

+3.85%

PFI vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFI vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than GSIB's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
1.55%1.91%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF
0.96%0.68%2.77%1.85%1.93%1.28%1.56%0.92%1.98%0.35%2.16%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFI and GSIB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFI has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to GSIB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 49.59% vs 16.89% for PFI. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 49.59% return vs 16.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PFI.

GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.96% for PFI.

PFI is categorized as Momentum, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.35% for GSIB.

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFI and GSIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer