PFFV vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFFV is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. PFFV is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PFFV returned 3.27% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. PFFV charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFV achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

PFFV

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 1.41%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF	2.60%	2.08%	0.35%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFV and MSTZ is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.23

The correlation between PFFV and MSTZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (1 year) to -0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFFV vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFV

PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 26
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFFV	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.92	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	2.45	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.32	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	3.35	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	6.53	-3.71

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFV Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFV and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFFV	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-99.38%	+80.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.23%	-84.89%	+81.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-97.39%	+96.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-94.53%	+90.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	43.51%	-42.34%

Volatility

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) is 1.51%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that PFFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFFV	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	56.56%	-55.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	135.11%	-132.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11%	148.53%	-144.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.86%	171.02%	-162.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.63%	171.02%	-162.39%

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFFV vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF	8.16%	8.26%	7.33%	7.17%	6.60%	5.23%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFFV and MSTZ in my portfolio?

PFFV and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFFV or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to PFFV (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFV dropped -18.96% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, PFFV or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 3.27% for PFFV. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFFV or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 3.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFFV or MSTZ?

PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFFV or MSTZ?

PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.16%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between PFFV and MSTZ?

PFFV is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PFFV and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.