PFFV vs. CLOA
PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and CLOA (iShares AAA CLO Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFFV is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while CLOA is a CLO fund actively managed by BlackRock. PFFV is passively managed, while CLOA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFFV returned 7.71%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for CLOA. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFFV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CLOA.
Performance
PFFV vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PFFV having a 2.28% return and CLOA slightly lower at 2.27%.
PFFV
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFV vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 2.28% | 2.08% | 9.45% | 5.66% |
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | 2.27% | 5.44% | 7.25% | 8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFV and CLOA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PFFV and CLOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFV vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank
PFFV
CLOA
PFFV vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFFV | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 3.43 | -2.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 29.72 | -28.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 151.56 | -147.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFFV vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and CLOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFV | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -1.34% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.23% | -0.18% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | -1.13% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -0.05% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.03% | +1.13% |
Volatility
PFFV vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that PFFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFV | CLOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 0.15% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 0.49% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 0.69% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.85% | 1.31% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.66% | 1.31% | +7.35% |
PFFV vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PFFV vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison
PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than CLOA's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | 4.95% | 5.35% | 6.01% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 8.17% | 8.26% | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.23% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFV and CLOA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFV has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFV dropped -18.96% vs CLOA's -1.34%.
On 3-year performance, PFFV leads with 7.71% vs 6.62% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 7.71% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PFFV.
PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 4.95% for CLOA.
PFFV is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CLOA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PFFV and 0.20% for CLOA.
CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFV and CLOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer