PortfoliosLab logo
PFFV vs. CLOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PFFV and CLOA is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

PFFV vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.27%
17.45%
PFFV
CLOA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PFFV:

0.98

CLOA:

3.43

Sortino Ratio

PFFV:

1.40

CLOA:

4.59

Omega Ratio

PFFV:

1.19

CLOA:

2.21

Calmar Ratio

PFFV:

1.15

CLOA:

5.12

Martin Ratio

PFFV:

4.72

CLOA:

33.25

Ulcer Index

PFFV:

1.48%

CLOA:

0.17%

Daily Std Dev

PFFV:

7.14%

CLOA:

1.69%

Max Drawdown

PFFV:

-19.02%

CLOA:

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

PFFV:

-2.97%

CLOA:

-0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFV achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than CLOA's 1.05% return.


PFFV

YTD

-0.05%

1M

-1.99%

6M

-0.33%

1Y

7.33%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLOA

YTD

1.05%

1M

0.32%

6M

2.29%

1Y

5.77%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFFV vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for PFFV: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PFFV: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for CLOA: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CLOA: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFFV vs. CLOA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFFV is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFFV is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFFV is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFFV is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFFV is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFFV is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOA is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PFFV vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PFFV, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
PFFV: 0.98
CLOA: 3.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for PFFV, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PFFV: 1.40
CLOA: 4.59
The chart of Omega ratio for PFFV, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
PFFV: 1.19
CLOA: 2.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for PFFV, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
PFFV: 1.15
CLOA: 5.12
The chart of Martin ratio for PFFV, currently valued at 4.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
PFFV: 4.72
CLOA: 33.25

The current PFFV Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFV and CLOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.98
3.43
PFFV
CLOA

Dividends

PFFV vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than CLOA's 5.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
7.54%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.15%2.67%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.92%6.01%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFFV vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -19.02%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and CLOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.97%
-0.01%
PFFV
CLOA

Volatility

PFFV vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 1.49%. This indicates that PFFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.89%
1.49%
PFFV
CLOA