PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFR vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFR vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 17.34% return.


PFFR

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.40%

SCHH

1D
0.00%
1M
1.42%
6M
13.27%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
3.77%
ALL TIME*
7.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$783.15K$723.76K$619.25K
$149.01M$146.89M$141.73M

PFFR vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
2.85%5.36%7.12%21.04%-23.90%6.76%0.19%20.28%-7.45%7.82%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
17.34%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFR and SCHH is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.37

The correlation between PFFR and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFR vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFR
PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFR vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRSCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.19

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

7.31

-5.93

PFFR vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFR and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFR vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRSCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-44.22%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-8.28%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-17.76%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.80%

-33.28%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.61%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-9.36%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.48%

+0.44%

Volatility

PFFR vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) is 2.21%, while Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that PFFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRSCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

4.18%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

10.92%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

13.82%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.54%

18.79%

-8.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.02%

-0.65%

PFFR vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFR vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than SCHH's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
8.27%7.99%7.78%7.72%8.60%6.08%6.11%5.77%6.48%6.59%0.00%0.00%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.73%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFR and SCHH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to PFFR (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 5-year performance, SCHH leads with 3.12% vs 0.99% for PFFR. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 3.12% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFFR.

PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 2.73% for SCHH.

PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFFR and 0.07% for SCHH.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFR and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer