PFFR vs. PFLD
PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PFFR tracks the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index while PFLD tracks the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFR returned 1.03%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for PFLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
PFFR vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 2.58% return.
PFFR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFR vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 1.09% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 0.76% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.58% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFR and PFLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFFR and PFLD has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFFR vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFR
PFLD
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
PFFR
PFLD
-
Financial Services
PFFR
PFLD
-
Basic Materials
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Communication Services
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Energy
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Healthcare
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Industrials
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Technology
PFFR
-
PFLD
-
Utilities
PFFR
-
PFLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFR vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
PFFR
PFLD
PFFR vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFR | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.57 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 11.38 | -8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFR | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.70 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.14 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PFFR vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFR | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.02% | -33.20% | -19.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -2.23% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.16% | -6.41% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.80% | -15.51% | -14.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -0.10% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -4.17% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 0.50% | +2.30% |
Volatility
PFFR vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.83%. This indicates that PFFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFR | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 0.83% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 2.26% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.87% | 3.40% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 7.50% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 13.37% | +7.16% |
PFFR vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PFFR and PFLD have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
PFFR vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.27% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFR and PFLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFR has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to PFLD (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, PFFR leads with 1.03% vs 1.02% for PFLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFR has performed better with a 1.03% return vs 1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFR and PFLD have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.
PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Advisors Asset Management.
PFLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFR and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer