PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFR vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFR vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 2.33% return.


PFFR

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.40%

PFFA

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.73%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.60M$16.38M$20.01M
$783.15K$723.76K$619.25K

PFFR vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
2.85%5.36%7.12%21.04%-23.90%6.76%0.19%20.28%-3.25%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
2.33%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFR and PFFA is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.63

The correlation between PFFR and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFR vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFR
PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFR vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.16

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.04

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

2.98

-1.60

PFFR vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFR and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFR vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-70.52%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.49%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-12.15%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.80%

-22.70%

-7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.21%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-6.57%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.26%

+0.66%

Volatility

PFFR vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.32%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

6.53%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

7.63%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.54%

11.60%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

31.53%

-11.16%

PFFR vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFR vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, less than PFFA's 9.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.87%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
8.27%7.99%7.78%7.72%8.60%6.08%6.11%5.77%6.48%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFR and PFFA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to PFFR (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 5.57% vs 0.99% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 5.57% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.87%, compared with 8.27% for PFFR.

PFFR is categorized as REIT, while PFFA is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFFR and 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFR and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer